Michael Lalonde
2007-12-16 07:23:32 UTC
kook farts from david simmons of tasmania, au
Crescent Grove, Clapham Common (2/Dec/2000)
Certainty level: 100%
This is one of those clips where I am absolutely, 100% certain it's
inflicted by MI5 on me, because of background, context. On Saturday
2 December 2000, I was walking from my home to a pub on Clapham Common,
and on the way was in proximity to a group of three English youths
who were walking the other way. They turned from the main road into a
private estate called Crescent Grove. Here is what they said;
(first youth) "He masturbates!"
(his mate responds) "Yeah, he masturbates!"
(and again) "Thief!"
There is a lot of context associated with this incident, which I will now
relate.
Firstly, the verbal sexual abuse is a popular one with MI5, and as a
statementCertainty level: 100%
This is one of those clips where I am absolutely, 100% certain it's
inflicted by MI5 on me, because of background, context. On Saturday
2 December 2000, I was walking from my home to a pub on Clapham Common,
and on the way was in proximity to a group of three English youths
who were walking the other way. They turned from the main road into a
private estate called Crescent Grove. Here is what they said;
(first youth) "He masturbates!"
(his mate responds) "Yeah, he masturbates!"
(and again) "Thief!"
There is a lot of context associated with this incident, which I will now
relate.
Firstly, the verbal sexual abuse is a popular one with MI5, and as a
about me is currently mostly in their imaginations. The accusation has to
be seenrelative to MI5's persecutory actions in late November and early December
2000,and in fact for some months leading up to this. Their relevant activities
inJune 2000 are documented in a message in this evidence item;
following from that, they sent someone to simulate an act in front of my
window,following from that, they sent someone to simulate an act in front of my
which was captured on film.
It is the publication of the video of their agent performing the act on
himselfIt is the publication of the video of their agent performing the act on
which caused MI5 to restart this thread of harassment in the first few
days ofDecember 2000. But there are some subtleties; I uploaded the digitised
videoto this website on 26/November/2000; but I did not announce its existence
on thenewsgroups until Sunday 3/December/2000. These youths' slur was made the
previousday, on Saturday 2/Dec. That tells us quite a lot. According to my website
logs,there were no accesses to the video file before Sunday 3/Dec. So why did
MI5 restartthis particular thread of abuse, before their agent's activities were
published on the newsgroup? The conclusion we reach is that they were
watching mypublished on the newsgroup? The conclusion we reach is that they were
internet connection, either decoding the telephone line, or at the ISP;
and/or theymay be able to physically see what is on my notebook computer's screen,
fromRF transmissions from its VGA circuitry. I do not know whether the latter
istechnically feasible, but the former certainly is, and I have known for
yearsthat MI5 bugs my internet activities and phone calls. It is from their
observationof my internet connection that they were able to tell, without accessing
thevideo file over the net, that it was of their agent in a compromising
position;and it was from that observation that their shouted slur on 2/Dec
emanates.The second accusation, "Thief!", is even more interesting. It relates to
occurrencesfrom June of 2000, some six months before these youths threw the word at
me. It showsjust how wide in reach geographically and temporally the MI5 persecution
is;they react to something which happened half a year previously.
In the first half of 2000, MI5 made a determined assault on my
friendships. In oneIn the first half of 2000, MI5 made a determined assault on my
particular case, that of A. whom I had known for virtually all my life,
they partlysucceeded. This person made pointed references to me which made it clear
he knewwhat was happening; at one point he started asking "do you know anything
about theFBI and the CIA". In June 2000, we went to see a film in the West End. I
paid forboth of us, and then asked him to return what I had paid for his ticket,
some £7.50.He was reluctant to do so. Eventually he returned £5, settling for the
lesser gain of £2.50.I did not call him a thief to his face, but I may have spoken the word
while I wasat home, either conscious or in my sleep. MI5 have very tight control over
everythingI do and say in my home through their bugs; if I say anything against
someone in"their" camp, they turn round the accusation against me. So, from the fact
that A.tried to garner a few pounds at my expense, MI5 create the accusation, six
monthslater..... "thief!".
20884
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
20884
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access